A reclassification of Min languages

Discussions on the Hokkien (Minnan) language.
xng
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:19 pm

A reclassification of Min languages

Postby xng » Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:29 am

The classification of Germanic languages (West Germanic, East Germanic, North Germanic) is more logical as it groups languages based on common ancestors and similarities of both cognates and grammar.

Unfortunately, the current 'standard' grouping of Min languages is all wrong. Actually, Min languages can be grouped into only 3 distinct grouping i.e. Southern Min, Northern Min and Eastern Min.

1. Northern Min (Minbei, Minzhong, Shaojiang Min) - Both Shaojiang Min and Minzhong split off from Minbei around a few hundred years ago.They are all mutually unintelligible.

2. Eastern Min (Mindong, Manhua?, Manjiang?) - there are actually a few mutually unintelligible languages that split off from Mindong.

3. Southern Min (mentioned in thread below)

http://www.chinalanguage.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=58902&sid=f62809c0fe89a197e2c1ad62d93df325

The historical establishment of Fuzhou city (Eastern Min) is quite different from the historical establishment of Quanzhou city (Southern Min) i.e. Quanzhou language didn't split off from Fuzhou language.

I somewhat (but not entirely) agree with the author of the link below. If we base languages on mutual intelligibility, there are at least a few thousand Chinese languages in China and not just 7 in the 'standard' classification. :lol:

https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2008/12/27/a-reworking-of-chinese-language-classification/

Return to “Hokkien (Minnan) language”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests